What is Data-Centric AI?
AI-powered applications are becoming increasingly widespread across many areas and industries, including e-commerce, finance, manufacturing, medicine, and many more. However, there are many considerations necessary to successfully develop robust and reliable ML systems, which can often be overlooked.
We’re aiming to change that with a data-centric AI lens. But, what does it mean?
The current paradigm in machine learning is model-centric AI. The data is considered a fixed and static asset (e.g. tabular data in a .csv file, a database, a language corpus or an image repository). The data is often considered somewhat external to the machine learning process. The focus is then on model iteration, whether it is new model architectures, novel loss functions or optimisers – with the goal of improving predictive performance for a fixed benchmark.
Of course, this agenda is important — but we need more reliable ML systems. We believe that the current focus on models and architectures as a panacea in the ML community is often a source of brittleness in real-world applications. We believe that the data work, often undervalued as merely operational, is key to unlocking reliable ML systems.
In data-centric AI, we seek to give data centre stage. Data-centric AI views model or algorithmic refinement as less important (and in certain settings, algorithmic development is even considered as a solved problem), and instead seeks to systematically improve the data used by ML systems.
We go further and call for an expanded definition of data-centric AI such that a data-centric lens is applicable to end-to-end pipelines.
DEFINITION
Data-centric AI encompasses methods and tools to systematically: characterise, evaluate and generate the underlying data used to train and evaluate models
At the ML pipeline level, this means that the considerations at each stage should be informed in a data-driven manner.
We term this a data-centric lens. Since data is the fuel for any ML system, we should keep a sharp focus on the data, yet rather than ignoring the model, we should leverage the data-driven insights as feedback to systematically improve the model.

DC-Check: A Data-Centric AI checklist to guide the development of reliable machine learning systems.
DC-Check is an actionable checklist-style framework to elicit data-centric considerations through the different stages of the ML pipeline: Data, Training, Testing, and Deployment. This data-centric lens on development of ML systems aims to promote thoughtfulness and transparency prior to system development.
Data-Centric AI Research Area
Our approach is to build a reference guide for both clinical practitioners and researchers, highlighting specific data-centric AI challenges and research opportunities.
Here, we have created a comprehensive overview graphic in order to communicate the design of data-centric ML pipelines.
Click on the specific areas in the graphic to learn more about our current work.

Data quality - Data characterisation
Unlock the power of data characterisation: Learn how techniques like Data-IQ, TRIAGE, and Datagnosis help audit datasets, boost model efficiency, and improve training by identifying easy, ambiguous, and unlearnable samples.
Explore these tools to enhance your machine learning projects.
Synthetic data for data improvement
Discover how synthetic data can enhance real datasets by augmenting small samples and ensuring fairness. By applying data characterisation techniques, we can guide synthetic data generation to reflect real-world complexities while using novel metrics to ensure quality.
Uncertainty Estimation
Uncertainty estimation is vital to ensure trustworthy predictions from ML models. In particular, we desire that models ‘know what they don’t know’.
Read more: https://www.vanderschaar-lab.com/trustworthy-predictions/
Data monitoring
Identification and appropriate handling of inconsistencies in data at deployment time is crucial to using machine learning models reliably.
Read more: https://www.vanderschaar-lab.com/data-monitoring/
Model testing — stress test scenarios and evaluations beyond subgroups
Machine learning models fail in real-world scenarios! This is especially worrying in high-stakes settings like healthcare where we might have unreliable model performance for different subgroups or across different distributions.
Our most recent work
ICLR
2025

Going Beyond Static: Understanding Shifts with Time-Series Attribution
This paper propose a time-series shift attribution framework that attributes performance degradation from various types of shifts to each temporal data property in a detailed manner, supported by theoretical analysis and empirical results.
In review
2025
SynthCraft: an AI partner for synthetic data generation to support data access and augmentation in healthcare
Code: https://github.com/vanderschaarlab/SynthCraft
This paper introduces SynthCraft, a human-in-the-loop framework that uses LLMs together with reinforcement-learning–based reasoning to orchestrate synthetic data generation workflows. It enables principled evaluation of privacy, statistical fidelity, and downstream utility across tabular and genomic datasets, supporting transparent and flexible use of state-of-the-art synthetic data methods.
Journal of Data-centric Machine Learning Research
2025

DMLR: Towards Human-Guided, Data-Centric LLM Co-Pilots
This paper proposes CliMB-DC, a human-guided, data-centric framework for LLM-based ML co-pilots. By combining domain expert input with structured multi-agent reasoning and data-centric tools, it enables robust handling of real-world data issues and turns messy datasets into ML-ready inputs, outperforming existing co-pilot approaches on healthcare data.
NeurIPS
2024

Matchmaker: Self-Improving Large Language Model Programs for Schema Matching
This paper proposes Matchmaker, a language-model–based framework for automatically matching fields across different data schemas. It works without labeled training data, self-improves in a zero-shot setting, and outperforms existing methods on real-world medical datasets, enabling faster data integration for ML-ready systems.
Journal of Data-centric Machine Learning Research
2024

DMLR: You can’t handle the (dirty) truth: Data-centric insights improve pseudo-labeling
This paper challenges the assumption that labeled data used in pseudo-labeling is always reliable, showing that label noise and ambiguity can significantly affect performance. It introduces DIPS, a data-centric framework that analyzes learning dynamics to select high-quality labeled and pseudo-labeled samples, improving robustness and data efficiency across tabular and image datasets.
Journal of Data-centric Machine Learning Research
2024

DMLR: When is Off-Policy Evaluation Useful? A Data-Centric Perspective
This paper proposes DataCOPE, a framework for off-policy evaluation. It assesses whether and how reliably a logged dataset can be used to evaluate a target policy, highlighting potential failure cases before real-world deployment.






















